murmur

murmur · sector study · September 2026

What AI tools answer when a farm operator looks for a system

25 questions asked across 4 AI tools, with 98 responses saved as screenshots. No question names a system: these are the questions a producer types before signing with a provider.

This study does not pick a winner. The count is the same for everyone: the name is written in the response or it is not. Any company that appeared zero times is not included on this page, and no company commissioned, reviewed or paid for this study.

01 · who appears

One name occupies two thirds of responses, while second place is below one fifth

Aegro appears in 65 of the 98 responses. The runner-up, Climate FieldView, appears in 19. That is a 47-percentage-point gap, the largest distance between first and second in every study we have conducted. There are 24 different systems cited in total and 247 mentions combined, but one name alone accounts for more than a quarter of them.

systemin how many of the 98 responsesshare of all mentionsaverage position in the listin how many of the 25 questions
Aegro65 66%26.3%1.223
Climate FieldView19 19%7.7%3.110
Perfarm15 15%6.1%2.711
MyFarm13 13%5.3%2.57
JetBov12 12%4.9%2.58
Solinftec12 12%4.9%3.211
Siagri11 11%4.5%3.28
Farmbox9 9%3.6%2.98
Agrare8 8%3.2%2.98
SSCrop8 8%3.2%3.07
FarmPlus7 7%2.8%2.16
Gsoft7 7%2.8%3.46
Agrotis6 6%2.4%3.36
Cropwise6 6%2.4%2.56
FieldView6 6%2.4%3.85
GAtec6 6%2.4%2.76
Strider6 6%2.4%2.55
Connectere5 5%2.0%4.25
Gestor Rural5 5%2.0%3.45
Investidor Rural5 5%2.0%3.05
TOTVS Agro5 5%2.0%3.03
Farmbrite4 4%1.6%3.24
Mhais4 4%1.6%3.84
Agrocash3 3%1.2%3.73
How to read it. The second column shows how many responses contained the name. The third is the system’s share of everything cited: the 24 systems add up to 247 mentions, and this column divides that total. The fourth shows the name’s usual position in the list: 1.0 would mean it was always first. Fazenda Melhor was measured and never appeared, so it is not in the table.
02 · order within the response

Appearing is one thing; being the first name is another

AI tools almost never answer with just one system: there are 2.5 names per response on average. That is why where a name enters the list matters as much as whether it appears. Aegro is the name that most often opens the list, with an average position of 1.2. Siagri is at the other extreme: it appears in 11 responses and enters at an average position of 3.2, after the reader has already passed other names.

Here the concentration appears again, and more strongly. The leader is not only the most cited: it enters at an average position of 1.2, so it is almost always the first name the reader sees. Those in the middle of the table compete for the attention of someone who has already read one name.

03 · one tool is not another

Each tool has its own ranking

The same system changes in scale depending on where it is asked about. Climate FieldView is the strongest case: it appears in 36% of Claude’s responses and 4% of Google’s. That is a 32-percentage-point gap between its best and worst tool. For anyone outside the top positions, that means there is a tool where they can compete and a tool where they cannot.

systemChatGPT
25 responses
Claude
25 responses
Google
25 responses
Perplexity
23 responses
Aegro15171815
Climate FieldView3916
Perfarm0447
MyFarm3253
JetBov7122
Solinftec4701
Siagri7121
Farmbox6102
Agrare0161
SSCrop0161
FarmPlus1015
Gsoft0232
Agrotis1050
Cropwise1302
FieldView3102
GAtec6000
Strider0501
Connectere0212
Gestor Rural0041
Investidor Rural2030
TOTVS Agro1112
Farmbrite0400
Mhais0400
Agrocash0003
04 · where the response comes from

Being read by the AI tool almost guarantees being cited by it.

In 47 of the 98 responses, it is possible to see which sites the tool consulted. There were 105 different sites, and the most used was aegro.com.br, Aegro’s site, in 15 of the 47. Among the ten most-used sites, 6 belong to the systems measured and 4 are outside sources, such as agrofounder.com and apps.apple.com.

What the tool reads shows up in what it writes: when the system’s site was consulted, its name appeared in the response 94% of the time. When it was not consulted, the name appeared in 7%. It is worth separating from the rest what appears in the text without competing for the system subscription: John Deere and Trimble manufacture agricultural machinery. They were measured and remain outside the table. Their software exists, but it is an accessory to the machines they sell, not a management system contracted separately. John Deere appears in 8 of the 98 responses because of autopilot and telemetry.

siteused as a source in how many of the 47
aegro.com.br15
mhais.com.br7
agrofounder.com5
apps.apple.com5
farmplus.com.br5
perfarm.com5
play.google.com5
farmbox.com.br4
agrocash.com.br3
chb.com.br3
gsoft.com.br3
naia.today3
systemsite used as a sourcename written in the response
Aegro17 of 4765 of 98
Climate FieldView2 of 4719 of 98
Perfarm5 of 4715 of 98
MyFarm2 of 4713 of 98
JetBov3 of 4712 of 98
Solinftec2 of 4712 of 98
Siagri2 of 4711 of 98
Farmbox4 of 479 of 98
Agrare1 of 478 of 98
SSCrop0 of 478 of 98
FarmPlus5 of 477 of 98
Gsoft3 of 477 of 98
Agrotis0 of 476 of 98
Cropwise0 of 476 of 98
FieldView2 of 476 of 98
GAtec1 of 476 of 98
Strider0 of 476 of 98
Connectere1 of 475 of 98
Gestor Rural0 of 475 of 98
Investidor Rural2 of 475 of 98
TOTVS Agro1 of 475 of 98
Farmbrite0 of 474 of 98
Mhais7 of 474 of 98
Agrocash3 of 473 of 98
What this section does not cover. This section looks only at ChatGPT, Claude, Google and Perplexity, which show the list of sites consulted.
05 · the question category

The concentration does not change with the question category

The 25 questions were written across four categories: general recommendation, property size or segment, system feature and informational. The leader tops all four, by a wide margin in three. In the broadest category, the 23 responses to people asking only which is best, Aegro appears in 74% and the runner-up, MyFarm, in 35%.

question category1st2nd3rd4th
general recommendation 23 responsesAegro 74%MyFarm 35%Climate FieldView 22%JetBov 22%
by size or segment 20 responsesAegro 70%Climate FieldView 25%MyFarm 20%Solinftec 20%
by system feature 36 responsesAegro 78%Climate FieldView 22%Perfarm 17%Siagri 14%
informational 19 responsesAegro 32%Investidor Rural 16%Agrare 11%Cropwise 11%

The only visible opening is in the informational category, for people still learning how to buy: there the leader falls to one third of responses and names that appear nowhere else rise into the list. It is the question of someone who does not yet have a provider in mind.

06 · how we measure

How we measure

  • We asked the 25 questions in 4 tools, once each, in September 2026. That would make 100 responses; we retained 98. Perplexity produced 23 of the 25: 2 captures failed. Each question was asked in a clean window, in a temporary conversation with no history, from an IP in Brazil. We saved a screenshot of every one.
  • No question includes a system name. All ask for a recommendation, the way a farm operator asks.
  • We count only when the AI tool writes the system’s name in the response. When the name appears only in the list of sites consulted, it does not enter this count: that is a different thing, measured separately in section 04.
  • We count only what the tool wrote. Website cards, videos and map listings around the response are excluded, because the AI tool did not choose those names.
  • The table’s names came from the responses themselves. We did not start with a ready-made list, so there is no outside system that "should" be there: if it was never cited, it does not appear.
  • Each name is counted separately, even when two rows belong to the same company. The table shows the name as the AI tool wrote it. Where the same company is written in two forms, it occupies two rows, because that is how it reaches someone reading the response.
07 · limits

What this study does not say

  • Nothing about service quality. What is measured is what AI tools answer, not which system is better to use or who charges less.
  • Nothing about how much each thing is searched for. The 25 questions represent how people ask, not a sample weighted by search volume.
  • Nothing about what the AI tool answers for you. Responses vary with the previous conversation, region and day. This is a September 2026 snapshot from a clean window.
  • Nothing about how to change this result. This material measures; it is not an action plan.
08 · the questions

All 25 questions, in full

Original Portuguese research evidence, preserved as recorded.

  1. 01melhor software de gestao agricola para fazenda
  2. 02qual sistema de gestao rural vale a pena contratar
  3. 03me indique um software para gerenciar a minha fazenda
  4. 04qual o melhor software para o agronegocio em 2026
  5. 05software de gestao agricola com melhor custo beneficio
  6. 06melhor sistema de gestao para fazenda pequena de um produtor so
  7. 07qual software para fazenda grande com varias areas
  8. 08melhor software de gestao para pecuaria de corte
  9. 09qual sistema agricola controla custo por talhao
  10. 10software agricola que funciona offline no campo sem internet
  11. 11qual sistema de gestao agricola para lavoura de soja e milho
  12. 12melhor software para caderno de campo digital
  13. 13qual software agricola faz controle de estoque de insumo
  14. 14sistema de gestao agricola que emite nota fiscal do produtor
  15. 15qual software agricola integra com maquina e piloto automatico
  16. 16melhor software de gestao para fazenda de cafe
  17. 17qual sistema agricola tem aplicativo para o celular do agronomo
  18. 18software agricola com imagem de satelite e mapa de produtividade
  19. 19qual software de gestao agricola e mais barato para comecar
  20. 20melhor sistema para gestao financeira de fazenda
  21. 21quanto custa um software de gestao agricola por hectare
  22. 22vale a pena sair da planilha para um software de fazenda
  23. 23como escolher software de gestao agricola para a minha cultura
  24. 24o que um software de gestao rural precisa ter
  25. 25software agricola serve para quem arrenda terra