murmur · sector study · September 2026
What AI tools answer when an HR team looks for benefits cards
25 questions asked across 4 AI tools, with 98 responses saved as screenshots. No question names a provider: these are the questions decision-makers type before requesting a proposal.
This study does not pick a winner. The count is the same for everyone: the name is written in the response or it is not. Anyone appearing zero times is not included on this page, and no company commissioned, reviewed or paid for this study.
No one dominates: 5 names appear in more than half of responses
Caju is cited most often, in 80 of 98 responses, but the gap to those below is small: there are 5 providers above half, and there is a 30-point spread from the first to the last of them. AI distributes recommendations in this market, and a response naming only one provider is rare.
| provider | in how many of the 98 responses | share of all mentions | average place in the list | in how many of the 25 questions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caju | 80 82% | 17.9% | 2.0 | 25 |
| Flash | 75 77% | 16.7% | 2.3 | 25 |
| Swile | 70 71% | 15.6% | 3.2 | 25 |
| Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) | 59 60% | 13.2% | 3.8 | 25 |
| Ticket | 51 52% | 11.4% | 4.0 | 22 |
| Alelo | 48 49% | 10.7% | 3.8 | 23 |
| iFood Benefits | 37 38% | 8.3% | 4.3 | 21 |
| VR Benefits | 16 16% | 3.6% | 3.4 | 14 |
| Alymente | 10 10% | 2.2% | 3.9 | 9 |
| Bee Vale | 1 1% | 0.2% | 5.0 | 1 |
| Vee Benefits | 1 1% | 0.2% | 7.0 | 1 |
Appearing is one thing; being the first name is another
AI almost never answers with just one provider: it averages 4.6 names per response. That is why where a name appears matters as much as appearing at all. Caju opens the list most often, with an average place of 2.0. iFood Benefits is at the other extreme: it appears in 37 responses and enters at 4.3rd on average, after the reader has already seen other names.
For providers in the middle of the table, this is where the difference lies between being considered and merely mentioned. A list has a beginning, and anyone arriving at its end competes with names the reader has already seen.
Each tool has its own ranking
The same provider changes in size depending on where the question is asked. Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) is the strongest case: it appears in 83% of Perplexity responses and 32% of ChatGPT responses. For anyone outside the top positions, this means there are tools where they can compete and tools where they cannot.
| provider | ChatGPT 25 responses | Claude 25 responses | Google 25 responses | Perplexity 23 responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caju | 25 | 20 | 20 | 15 |
| Flash | 19 | 20 | 22 | 14 |
| Swile | 23 | 16 | 21 | 10 |
| Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) | 8 | 15 | 17 | 19 |
| Ticket | 10 | 14 | 10 | 17 |
| Alelo | 10 | 17 | 8 | 13 |
| iFood Benefits | 16 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| VR Benefits | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Alymente | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Bee Vale | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Vee Benefits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Being read by AI almost guarantees being cited by it
In 61 of the 98 responses, it is possible to see which sites the tool consulted. There were 93 different sites, and the most used of all is caju.com.br, Caju’s site, in 16 of the 61. Among the ten most used, 7 are sites belonging to the providers measured and 3 are outside sites, such as benway.com.br and www1.folha.uol.com.br.
What the tool reads also appears in what it writes: when the provider’s site was consulted, its name appeared in the response 95% of the time. When it was not consulted, the name appeared in 37%. It is worth separating what appears in the text without competing for the sale: Elo, Mastercard, Sólides, TOTVS, Visa and Wellhub are card networks or HR software; they were measured and remain outside the table.
| site | used as a source in how many of the 61 |
|---|---|
| caju.com.br | 16 |
| swile.com.br | 16 |
| ticket.com.br | 14 |
| benway.com.br | 13 |
| www1.folha.uol.com.br | 11 |
| pluxee.com.br | 10 |
| beneficios.ifood.com.br | 9 |
| beneficios.swile.com.br | 8 |
| flashapp.com.br | 6 |
| biz.com.br | 5 |
| ajuda.swile.com.br | 4 |
| alelo.com.br | 4 |
| provider | site used as a source | name written in the response |
|---|---|---|
| Caju | 18 of 61 | 60 of 73 |
| Flash | 6 of 61 | 53 of 73 |
| Swile | 20 of 61 | 49 of 73 |
| Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) | 11 of 61 | 42 of 73 |
| Ticket | 14 of 61 | 41 of 73 |
| Alelo | 4 of 61 | 40 of 73 |
| iFood Benefits | 9 of 61 | 32 of 73 |
| VR Benefits | 1 of 61 | 12 of 73 |
| Alymente | 2 of 61 | 10 of 73 |
| Bee Vale | 0 of 61 | 0 of 73 |
| Vee Benefits | 0 of 61 | 1 of 73 |
Question categories make little difference at the top
The 25 questions covered five categories: general recommendations, company size, benefit type, HR operational challenges, and company circumstances. The leading names recur in almost all of them.
| question category | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| general recommendation 23 responses | Caju 70% | Flash 70% | Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) 65% | Swile 61% |
| by company size 16 responses | Caju 81% | Flash 81% | Swile 69% | Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) 62% |
| by benefit type 20 responses | Caju 90% | Flash 90% | Swile 70% | Ticket 60% |
| by HR pain point 20 responses | Caju 90% | Flash 80% | Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) 80% | Swile 80% |
| by company situation 19 responses | Caju 79% | Swile 79% | Flash 63% | Pluxee (formerly Sodexo) 37% |
Differences between question categories emerge in the middle of the table, not at the top. For providers outside the leading positions, that is where an opening exists: a company size or benefit type for which AI already names other providers.
How we measure
- We asked the 25 questions in 4 tools, once each, in September 2026. That would yield 100 responses; we retained 98. In Perplexity, 23 of 25 were retained: 2 captures failed. Each question was asked in a clean window, in a temporary conversation without history, from an IP in Brazil. We saved every screenshot.
- No question names a provider. All ask for recommendations, as decision-makers ask before requesting a proposal.
- We count only when AI writes the provider’s name in the response. When the name appears only in the list of sites consulted, it does not enter this count: that is something else, measured separately in section 04.
- We count only what the tool wrote. Site cards, videos and map listings around the response are excluded because AI is not choosing the name there.
- The names in the table came from the responses themselves. We did not begin with a ready-made list, so no outside provider ‘should’ be there: if it was not cited once, it does not appear.
- Pluxee and Sodexo count as one company: the AI tools themselves write “Pluxee (antiga Sodexo)” — “Pluxee (formerly Sodexo)” in English.
- VR was counted only when written as “VR Benefícios”. “VR” alone is the Portuguese abbreviation for meal voucher and appears in sentences that do not refer to the company, such as “modelo tradicional (VR/VA separados)” (“traditional model, separate meal/food vouchers”). Its figure is an undercount, never an overcount.
What this study does not say
- Nothing about service quality. What is measured is what AI tools answer, not who has the best acceptance network or the lowest fee.
- Nothing about how much each thing is searched. The 25 questions reflect how decision-makers ask, not a sample weighted by search volume.
- Nothing about what AI answers for you. Responses vary with the preceding conversation, region and day. This is a September 2026 snapshot in a clean window.
- Nothing about how to change this result. This material measures; it is not an action plan.
The 25 questions, in full
Original Portuguese research evidence, preserved as recorded.
- 01melhor cartao de beneficios flexiveis para empresas
- 02qual plataforma de beneficios contratar para minha empresa
- 03me indique um cartao de beneficios corporativos
- 04qual o melhor cartao multibeneficios em 2026
- 05qual empresa de beneficios corporativos vale a pena
- 06melhor fornecedor de vale refeicao e vale alimentacao
- 07melhor cartao de beneficios para empresa pequena
- 08qual plataforma de beneficios indicar para uma startup
- 09melhor cartao de beneficios para empresa com 50 funcionarios
- 10qual fornecedor de beneficios para empresa com mais de 500 funcionarios
- 11melhor cartao de beneficios com auxilio home office
- 12qual cartao de beneficios inclui mobilidade e combustivel
- 13melhor plataforma de beneficios com saude e bem estar
- 14qual cartao de beneficios permite o colaborador escolher a categoria
- 15melhor cartao de beneficios que atende o PAT
- 16qual plataforma de beneficios integra com o sistema de folha
- 17qual fornecedor de beneficios cobra a menor taxa
- 18qual cartao de beneficios tem a maior rede de aceitacao
- 19qual plataforma de beneficios tem o melhor aplicativo para o colaborador
- 20qual empresa de beneficios tem o melhor atendimento para o RH
- 21vale a pena trocar o vale refeicao tradicional por cartao flexivel e por qual
- 22qual fornecedor indicar para migrar de plataforma de beneficios
- 23melhor cartao de beneficios para empresa com equipe remota
- 24qual plataforma de beneficios para quem tem funcionario em varios estados
- 25melhor cartao de beneficios para industria e trabalho presencial