murmur

murmur · sector study · September 2026

What AI tools answer when a gym owner looks for a system

25 questions asked across 4 AI tools, with 95 responses saved as screenshots. No question names a system: these are the questions a gym owner types before signing with a provider.

This study does not pick a winner. The count is the same for everyone: the name is written in the response or it is not. Any company that appeared zero times is not included on this page, and no company commissioned, reviewed or paid for this study.

01 · who appears

Three names above half, with a gap only appearing in fourth place

Tecnofit appears in 63 of the 95 responses, Pacto in 60, and Next Fit in 52. From first to third, the gap is 12 percentage points, which is small: none of the three has pulled away. The drop comes after that, from third to fourth place, EVO, at 42. There are 18 different systems cited in total and 351 mentions combined.

systemin how many of the 95 responsesshare of all mentionsaverage position in the listin how many of the 25 questions
Tecnofit63 66%17.9%1.924
Pacto60 63%17.1%2.922
Next Fit52 55%14.8%2.722
EVO42 44%12.0%3.322
Sistema Pacto34 36%9.7%3.417
W1222 23%6.3%4.013
ABC Evo16 17%4.6%3.111
SCA14 15%4.0%4.211
SULTS12 13%3.4%5.86
Cloud Gym6 6%1.7%4.74
Fitblox6 6%1.7%3.25
Topdata6 6%1.7%1.82
Mindbody5 5%1.4%2.45
Aluno em Dia3 3%0.9%3.72
Octagym3 3%0.9%4.03
RunFit3 3%0.9%3.73
Gymvox2 2%0.6%2.52
iGeriu2 2%0.6%2.52
How to read it. The second column shows how many responses contained the name. The third is the system’s share of everything cited: the 18 systems add up to 351 mentions, and this column divides that total. The fourth shows the name’s usual position in the list: 1.0 would mean it was always first.
02 · order within the response

Appearing is one thing; being the first name is another

AI tools almost never answer with just one system: there are 3.7 names per response on average. That is why where a name enters the list matters as much as whether it appears. Tecnofit is the name that most often opens the list, with an average position of 1.9. SULTS is at the other extreme: it appears in 12 responses and enters at an average position of 5.8, after the reader has already passed other names.

At a close-packed top like this page’s, this column separates the first three. All of them appear; only one opens the list.

03 · one tool is not another

Each tool has its own ranking

The same system changes in scale depending on where it is asked about. Next Fit is the strongest case: it appears in 73% of Google’s responses and 20% of Claude’s. That is a 53-percentage-point gap between its best and worst tool. For anyone outside the top positions, that means there is a tool where they can compete and a tool where they cannot.

systemChatGPT
25 responses
Claude
25 responses
Google
22 responses
Perplexity
23 responses
Tecnofit18111816
Pacto17171313
Next Fit1651615
EVO814128
Sistema Pacto77128
W125755
ABC Evo3292
SCA6044
SULTS3261
Cloud Gym1104
Fitblox3021
Topdata2112
Mindbody0500
Aluno em Dia1002
Octagym0003
RunFit3000
Gymvox2000
iGeriu2000
04 · where the response comes from

Being read by the AI tool almost guarantees being cited by it.

In 57 of the 95 responses, it is possible to see which sites the tool consulted. There were 113 different sites, and the most used was tecnofit.com.br, Tecnofit’s site, in 20 of the 57. Among the ten most-used sites, 7 belong to the systems measured and 3 are outside sources, such as b2bstack.com.br and apps.apple.com.

What the tool reads shows up in what it writes: when the system’s site was consulted, its name appeared in the response 79% of the time. When it was not consulted, the name appeared in 14%. It is worth separating from the rest what appears in the text without competing for the system subscription: ClassPass, TotalPass and Wellhub are employee-benefit platforms. They were measured and remain outside the table. The case of Wellhub stands out: it is written in 18 of the 95 responses because almost every question touches on integration with a benefit platform, not because it sells management software to gyms.

siteused as a source in how many of the 57
tecnofit.com.br20
blog.sistemapacto.com.br16
nextfit.com.br12
b2bstack.com.br7
lp.sistemapacto.com.br7
sults.com.br7
alunoemdia.com.br5
apps.apple.com4
sistemapacto.zendesk.com4
nfe.io3
octagym.ai3
runfit.com.br3
systemsite used as a sourcename written in the response
Tecnofit21 of 5745 of 73
Pacto29 of 5747 of 73
Next Fit14 of 5736 of 73
EVO0 of 5730 of 73
Sistema Pacto29 of 5722 of 73
W123 of 5717 of 73
ABC Evo2 of 577 of 73
SCA3 of 5710 of 73
SULTS7 of 576 of 73
Cloud Gym0 of 576 of 73
Fitblox2 of 574 of 73
Topdata3 of 575 of 73
Mindbody0 of 575 of 73
Aluno em Dia5 of 573 of 73
Octagym3 of 573 of 73
RunFit3 of 573 of 73
Gymvox2 of 572 of 73
iGeriu2 of 572 of 73
What this section does not cover. This section looks only at ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity, which show the list of sites consulted. Google does not show that list in the responses we captured, so it is excluded from this count, and only this one.
05 · the question category

In the broadest question, the top two appear in every response

The 25 questions were written across four categories: general recommendation, gym size or segment, system feature and informational. In the broadest category, the 22 responses to people asking only which system is best, Pacto and Tecnofit appear in 100%. It is not almost all: it is all of them. Someone arriving through the most generic question sees nothing else first.

question category1st2nd3rd4th
general recommendation 22 responsesPacto 100%Tecnofit 100%Next Fit 82%Sistema Pacto 77%
by size or segment 20 responsesTecnofit 60%EVO 45%Next Fit 45%Pacto 45%
by system feature 33 responsesTecnofit 73%Next Fit 70%Pacto 67%EVO 45%
informational 20 responsesPacto 35%EVO 25%Tecnofit 25%Sistema Pacto 20%

The picture changes when the question narrows. In the informational category, for people still learning how to buy, the same names fall to one third of responses. That category, and the one by gym size, is where there is an opening for names outside the first positions.

06 · how we measure

How we measure

  • We asked the 25 questions in 4 tools, once each, in September 2026. That would make 100 responses; we retained 95. Google produced 22 of the 25: 3 captures failed. Perplexity produced 23 of the 25: 2 captures failed. Each question was asked in a clean window, in a temporary conversation with no history, from an IP in Brazil. We saved a screenshot of every one.
  • No question includes a system name. All ask for a recommendation, the way a gym owner asks.
  • We count only when the AI tool writes the system’s name in the response. When the name appears only in the list of sites consulted, it does not enter this count: that is a different thing, measured separately in section 04.
  • We count only what the tool wrote. Website cards, videos and map listings around the response are excluded, because the AI tool did not choose those names.
  • The table’s names came from the responses themselves. We did not start with a ready-made list, so there is no outside system that "should" be there: if it was never cited, it does not appear.
  • Each name is counted separately, even when two rows belong to the same company. The table shows the name as the AI tool wrote it. Where the same company is written in two forms, it occupies two rows, because that is how it reaches someone reading the response.
07 · limits

What this study does not say

  • Nothing about service quality. What is measured is what AI tools answer, not which system is better to use or who charges less.
  • Nothing about how much each thing is searched for. The 25 questions represent how people ask, not a sample weighted by search volume.
  • Nothing about what the AI tool answers for you. Responses vary with the previous conversation, region and day. This is a September 2026 snapshot from a clean window.
  • Nothing about how to change this result. This material measures; it is not an action plan.
08 · the questions

All 25 questions, in full

Original Portuguese research evidence, preserved as recorded.

  1. 01melhor sistema de gestao para academia
  2. 02qual software para academia vale a pena contratar
  3. 03me indique um sistema bom para a minha academia
  4. 04qual o melhor sistema para academia em 2026
  5. 05sistema para academia com melhor custo beneficio
  6. 06melhor sistema para academia pequena de bairro
  7. 07qual sistema para rede de academias com varias unidades
  8. 08melhor sistema para box de crossfit
  9. 09qual sistema para estudio de pilates
  10. 10melhor software para estudio de treino personalizado
  11. 11qual sistema de academia faz cobranca recorrente no cartao
  12. 12sistema para academia que controla catraca e acesso
  13. 13qual sistema para academia tem aplicativo do aluno para treino
  14. 14melhor sistema para academia que faz prescricao de treino
  15. 15qual sistema de academia integra com aplicativo de beneficio corporativo
  16. 16melhor sistema para academia com venda online de plano
  17. 17qual sistema para academia ajuda a reduzir a evasao de aluno
  18. 18sistema para academia que emite nota fiscal automatico
  19. 19qual sistema para academia e mais facil para a recepcao usar
  20. 20melhor sistema para academia barato para quem esta comecando
  21. 21quanto custa um sistema de gestao para academia por mes
  22. 22vale a pena trocar a planilha por um sistema de academia
  23. 23como trocar de sistema de academia sem perder os alunos
  24. 24o que um sistema de gestao para academia precisa ter
  25. 25sistema de academia precisa de integracao com catraca